Tag Archive for: oilandgas

Unlock transparency and efficiency in oil and gas royalty management with blockchain. Explore its transformative potential in our comprehensive guide.

Role of blockchain in tracking oil and gas royalties

DISCLAIMER: We are not financial advisors. The content on this website related to the role of blockchain is for educational purposes only and merely cites our own personal opinions. In order to make the best financial decision that suits your own needs, you must conduct your own research and seek the advice of a licensed financial advisor if necessary. Know that all investments involve some form of risk and there is no guarantee that you will be successful in making, saving, or investing money; nor is there any guarantee that you won’t experience any loss when investing. Always remember to make smart decisions and do your own research!

Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative force in various industries, offering unparalleled transparency, security, and efficiency in data management. In the oil and gas sector, blockchain holds immense potential for revolutionizing the way royalties are tracked and managed. By leveraging blockchain-based solutions, stakeholders can streamline royalty payments, mitigate disputes, and enhance trust in the complex ecosystem of oil and gas production. In this comprehensive article, we explore the role of blockchain in tracking oil and gas royalties and its implications for industry stakeholders.

Understanding Blockchain Technology

At its core, blockchain is a decentralized, distributed ledger technology that records transactions across multiple nodes in a secure and immutable manner. Each block in the blockchain contains a timestamped record of transactions, cryptographically linked to the previous block, creating a chain of blocks that cannot be altered retroactively. This tamper-resistant nature of blockchain ensures data integrity and transparency, making it ideal for applications requiring trust and accountability.

Challenges in Royalty Management in the Oil and Gas Industry

The oil and gas industry operates within a complex network of stakeholders, including operators, landowners, investors, and regulatory agencies. Royalty payments, which represent the compensation owed to mineral rights owners for the extraction of oil and gas from their properties, are subject to various challenges, including:

  • Manual Processes: Traditional royalty management systems rely on manual processes. More oever on paper-based records, and disparate databases. This leads to inefficiencies, errors, and delays in payment processing.
  • Data Fragmentation: Royalty data is often fragmented across multiple parties and systems. It makes it difficult to track, reconcile, and audit royalty payments accurately.
  • Disputes and Non-Compliance: Discrepancies in royalty calculations, reporting inaccuracies, and contractual disputes can lead to conflicts. It is between operators and mineral rights owners, resulting in costly litigation and regulatory non-compliance.

Role of Blockchain in Royalty Tracking

Blockchain technology offers several key capabilities that address the challenges associated with royalty tracking in the oil and gas industry:

Immutable Record-Keeping: Blockchain provides a tamper-resistant record of royalty transactions, ensuring data integrity and transparency. Each royalty payment is recorded as a transaction on the blockchain. It is creating an immutable audit trail that can be accessed and verified by all relevant parties.

Smart Contracts: Smart contracts are self-executing agreements coded on the blockchain. It is automating the execution of contractual terms and conditions. In the context of royalty payments, smart contracts can automate payment calculations, distribution, and reconciliation. This is based on predefined rules, eliminating the need for intermediaries and reducing the risk of errors and disputes.

Transparency and Accountability: Blockchain enables real-time visibility into royalty transactions, allowing stakeholders to track the flow of funds and verify payment accuracy. By providing a transparent and auditable record of transactions, blockchain enhances trust and accountability among operators, landowners, and regulatory authorities.

Streamlined Settlements: Blockchain facilitates faster and more efficient settlement of royalty payments by eliminating intermediaries, reducing processing times, and lowering transaction costs. With blockchain-based royalty tracking systems, operators can streamline payment workflows, improve cash flow management, and enhance overall operational efficiency.

Enhanced Security: Blockchain employs cryptographic techniques to secure data integrity and protect against unauthorized access or tampering. By encrypting royalty transactions and storing them across multiple nodes in the network, blockchain mitigates the risk of fraud, cyber attacks, and data breaches, safeguarding sensitive royalty data.

Implementation Considerations and Challenges

While the potential benefits of blockchain in royalty tracking are significant, implementing blockchain-based solutions in the oil and gas industry presents several considerations and challenges:

  • Integration with Existing Systems: Integrating blockchain with legacy systems and industry standards poses technical challenges. It is requiring careful planning, collaboration, and interoperability testing.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring compliance with existing regulatory frameworks and data privacy laws is essential. Implementing blockchain solutions in the highly regulated oil and gas industry.
  • Scalability and Performance: Scalability and performance limitations of blockchain networks. This includes transaction throughput and latency, may impact the adoption and effectiveness of blockchain-based royalty tracking systems.
  • Industry Collaboration: Successful implementation of blockchain in royalty tracking requires collaboration among industry stakeholders, including operators, landowners, technology providers, and regulatory agencies, to establish common standards, governance models, and data sharing protocols.

Case Studies and Pilot Projects

Several companies and consortia in the oil and gas industry have already initiated blockchain-based pilot projects. They have proof-of-concept initiatives to explore the potential of blockchain in royalty tracking:

Petroteq Energy Inc.: Petroteq Energy, a Canadian oil sands mining company, announced a partnership with PermianChain Technologies. The  will develop a blockchain-based platform for tracking oil and gas production and royalty payments.

Ondiflo: Ondiflo, a blockchain startup, is collaborating with Chevron and Schlumberger. They will pilot a blockchain solution for automating and digitizing field operations. This includes royalty management, in the Permian Basin.

The OOC Oil & Gas Blockchain Consortium: The OOC Oil & Gas Blockchain Consortium, is comprised of major oil and gas companies such as Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell. It is exploring blockchain technology for various use cases, including royalty tracking, supply chain management, and trading.

 

Blockchain technology has the potential to transform royalty tracking in the oil and gas industry. It is offering transparency, efficiency, and trust in the management of royalty payments. By leveraging blockchain-based solutions, industry stakeholders can streamline payment processes, reduce disputes, and enhance collaboration across the value chain. However, successful implementation of blockchain in royalty tracking requires careful planning, collaboration, and regulatory compliance. Blockchain has the power to revolutionize royalty management. It will drive greater efficiency and transparency in the dynamic landscape of the oil and gas sector.

If you have further questions related to the Role of blockchain in tracking oil and gas royalties, reach out here.

Matador Resources Company has announced the acquisition of Permian Basin oil and gas properties from Ameredev II Parent, LLC for $1.9B.

Oil and Gas M&A momentum continues to build

Deals, Oil and Gas M&A – Matador Resources Company has announced the acquisition of Permian Basin oil and gas properties from Ameredev II Parent, LLC for $1.9 billion. This deal includes a 19% stake in Piñon Midstream and enhances Matador’s existing portfolio with high-quality assets in Lea County, New Mexico, and Loving and Winkler Counties, Texas.

The recent acquisition by Matador Resources marks a significant milestone in the company’s growth and strategic expansion efforts. With the addition of over 33,500 net acres in the Delaware basin, Matador’s total acreage now exceeds 190,000, solidifying its position as a key player in the oil and gas industry. Furthermore, the acquisition boosts the company’s production capabilities, with current production levels exceeding 180,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day and proven reserves totaling over 580 million barrels of oil equivalent. These impressive figures not only demonstrate Matador’s commitment to enhancing its asset base but also highlight the potential for increased free cash flow and profitability in the future.

Prolific Permian Basin

By strengthening its presence in the prolific Permian basin, specifically the Delaware sub-basin, Matador Resources is strategically positioning itself for sustained success in the competitive energy market. The addition of 431 operated drilling locations further enhances Matador’s operational scale and drilling inventory, providing ample opportunities for future growth and development. As a result of this acquisition, Matador’s growth trajectory is expected to accelerate, with market valuation projections now exceeding $10 billion. This strategic move underscores Matador’s commitment to driving value for shareholders while leveraging opportunities in one of the most productive regions in the United States for oil and gas exploration and production.

Click here to read the full article
Source: Oil Price

—

If you have any questions or thoughts about the topic related to Oil and Gas M&A, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

 

For now, gas prices are right around where they were last year, at $3.49 per gallon

OPEC+ oil cuts probably won’t move gas prices — but this wild card could

Thousands of miles away from Americans budgeting for their summer road trips. OPEC+ leaders decided Sunday to stick with crude-oil production cuts lasting through 2025. This is while laying out a plan to begin phasing out another tier of output curbs beginning in the fourth quarter.

Though crude-oil prices are easily the top cost inside a gallon of gas. Drivers at the pump shouldn’t expect big price moves as a direct result of the OPEC+ decision, gas experts say.

Gas-price increases could hinge on what type of hurricane season comes to the Gulf Coast. Its oil refineries later this summer they note. Weather forecasters have been bracing for a very active hurricane season.

Americans have been holding their breath on upcoming expenses, with many looking to road trips as affordable summer fun.

But first, put it in reverse to see what the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies decided at its Sunday meeting.

OPEC+ agreed to extend two different production cuts totaling 3.66 million barrels day through 2025. These curbs were supposed to conclude at the end of this year but were widely expected to be rolled over into next year.

Click here to read the full article
Source: Market Watch

—

If you have any questions or thoughts about the topic related to OPEC+, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

American oil and gas companies have cut back on methane emissions even as production reached record heights, a new analysis shows.

US oil and gas industry is emitting less carbon than it used to

The US oil and gas industry continues to extract record amounts of fossil fuels, despite climate activists’ calls to ​“keep it in the ground.” But while oil and gas extraction has increased in recent years, the carbon emissions from that industrial activity have actually fallen, a new analysis has found.

Even as fossil gas production rose by 40 percent from 2015 to 2022, methane emissions from gas extraction fell by 37 percent, according to a study of Environmental Protection Agency data published today by climate nonprofits Ceres and the Clean Air Task Force. That finding suggests that when energy companies want to, they can effectively reduce emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas with 82 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide over 20 years, and 30 times the warming potential over 100 years. Overall greenhouse gas emissions, which count the industry’s considerable carbon dioxide releases, also fell, but by a more modest 14 percent.

There’s a clear playbook for tackling the planet-warming emissions that result from combusting fossil fuels in power plants or vehicles. But the extraction of those fuels happens farther from public view, and adds up to a major source of industrial emissions. Indeed, oil and gas extraction and refining emitted more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than any other industrial subsector last year, the Rhodium Group reports. And while power and transportation emissions are falling, heavy industry is on track to become the largest emitting sector within the next decade.

Click here to read the full article
Source: Canary Media

—

If you have any questions or thoughts about the topic related to US oil and gas industry, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

The IER has just released its latest annual North American Energy Inventory report showing that North America has 1.66 trillion barrels of technically recoverable resources, and at current rates of consumption, the report calculates that it would take 227 years to deplete it all.

Report: America has up to 227 years of oil & gas remaining

Latest Oil & Gas Remaining or The Annual North American Energy Inventory

The Institute for Energy Research (IER), a free market think tank focusing on energy. Has just released its latest oil & gas remaining or the annual North American Energy Inventory. The report shows that North America has 1.66 trillion barrels of technically recoverable resources. And at current rates of consumption, the report calculates that it would take 227 years to deplete it all.

The report provides valuable insights into the current state of fossil fuel reserves. Particularly focusing on coal – renowned for being one of the most abundant fossil fuels available. It highlights that the proved reserves of coal stand. At a level that could potentially meet the global demand for over four centuries at the consumption rates witnessed in 2022.

The Significant Supply of Coal and its Enduring Presence

This substantial figure underscores the significant supply of coal and its enduring presence in the global energy mix. Contrary to the notion of imminent depletions such as “peak oil” or “peak gas”. The report challenges these concerns when it comes to coal. Urging against heeding the radicalized left’s rhetoric that often perpetuates such fear-mongering narratives.

The extensive longevity of coal reserves as indicated in the report serves as a compelling reminder of the need for a balanced and evidence-based approach to discussions around fossil fuels. By debunking the myth of an impending “peak coal,” the report encourages a more nuanced understanding of the energy landscape, emphasizing the importance of rational analysis over sensationalized claims.

In a time where energy security and sustainability are paramount considerations. The enduring reserve capacity of coal presents an opportunity for thoughtful consideration and strategic planning in meeting the world’s energy needs for the foreseeable future.

Click here to read the full article
Source: Marcellus Drilling News

—

If you have any questions or thoughts about the Oil & Gas Remaining Topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

Dive into ORRI vs. mineral rights: ownership, benefits & risks. Learn which investment suits your portfolio and goals. Explore now!

ORRI vs. Mineral Rights: Key Differences and Benefits

DISCLAIMER: We are not financial advisors. The content on this website is for educational purposes only and merely cites our own personal opinions. In order to make the best financial decision that suits your own needs, you must conduct your own research and seek the advice of a licensed financial advisor if necessary. Know that all investments involve some form of risk and there is no guarantee that you will be successful in making, saving, or investing money; nor is there any guarantee that you won’t experience any loss when investing. Always remember to make smart decisions and do your own research!

When it comes to investing in natural resources, understanding the distinctions between Overriding Royalty Interests (ORRIs) and mineral rights is crucial. While both offer opportunities for passive income from oil, gas, and mineral extraction, they differ significantly in terms of ownership, control, and financial benefits. In this in-depth analysis, we explore the key differences and benefits of ORRIs versus mineral rights, providing valuable insights for investors, landowners, and stakeholders in the energy and mining sectors.

Understanding Overriding Royalty Interests (ORRIs)

An Overriding Royalty Interest (ORRI) represents a contractual right to a share of production revenue from oil, gas, or mineral leases, separate from the ownership of the underlying mineral rights. ORRIs are typically granted to third parties, such as landowners or investors, by the lessee or operator of the property. ORRI holders receive a predetermined percentage of the gross production revenue, often without assuming the associated costs or liabilities of exploration and development activities.

Exploring Mineral Rights

Mineral rights, on the other hand, confer ownership and control over subsurface resources, including oil, gas, coal, metals, and other minerals. Holders of mineral rights have the exclusive authority to explore, extract, and develop these resources from the land or mineral estate they own. Unlike ORRIs, which are contractual interests, mineral rights represent a property interest in the underlying minerals, granting the holder significant control and financial benefits from resource extraction.

Key Differences between ORRI vs. Mineral Rights

Ownership and Control: The primary distinction between ORRIs and mineral rights lies in ownership and control. While mineral rights grant full ownership and control over subsurface resources, ORRIs entail a contractual entitlement to a share of production revenue, without ownership of the underlying minerals.

Financial Benefits: ORRIs provide passive income in the form of royalty payments based on the gross production revenue generated from the leased property. In contrast, holders of mineral rights not only receive royalty payments but also bear the costs and risks associated with exploration, development, and operation of the mineral resources.

Risk Exposure: ORRI holders typically have minimal exposure to operational risks, liabilities, and capital expenditures related to oil, gas, or mineral extraction. Conversely, holders of mineral rights assume the full spectrum of risks associated with resource development, including geological risks, environmental liabilities, and market volatility.

Transferability and Duration: ORRIs are often created through contractual agreements and may have limited transferability or duration, depending on the terms negotiated between the parties. In contrast, mineral rights are real property interests that can be bought, sold, leased, or inherited, with potentially perpetual duration, subject to legal and regulatory restrictions.

Benefits of ORRI vs. Mineral Rights

Passive Income: Both ORRIs and mineral rights offer opportunities for passive income from resource extraction, providing holders with a steady stream of royalty payments based on production volumes and market prices.

Portfolio Diversification: Investing in ORRIs or mineral rights can diversify investment portfolios, offering exposure to the energy and mining sectors, which may perform differently than traditional asset classes such as stocks, bonds, or real estate.

Inflation Hedge: Revenue generated from ORRIs and mineral rights may serve as a hedge against inflation, as commodity prices tend to rise over time, preserving the purchasing power of income streams.

Tax Advantages: Royalty income derived from ORRIs and mineral rights may be subject to favorable tax treatment, including depletion allowances, capital gains treatment, and potential tax deferral strategies.

 

ORRIs and mineral rights represent distinct yet valuable investment opportunities in the natural resources sector. While ORRIs offer passive income without the burdens of ownership and operational risks, mineral rights provide ownership and control over subsurface resources, with the potential for greater financial rewards but also higher levels of risk and responsibility. Understanding the differences and benefits of ORRIs versus mineral rights is essential for investors, landowners, and stakeholders seeking to capitalize on opportunities in oil, gas, and mineral exploration and production. By evaluating their investment objectives, risk tolerance, and financial goals, individuals can determine the most suitable strategy for participating in the dynamic and rewarding world of natural resource investing.

 

If you have further questions related to the ORRI vs. Mineral Rights topic, feel free to reach out to us here.

As a group, the oil and gas industry’s free cash flow-to-capital expenditures ratio rose to 1 last year from 0.4 in 2020, and it’s forecast to approach 1.4 by 2030.

Gas & Oil companies are swimming in so much cash that they’re cutting back on borrowing at a faster pace

Demand for Loans

Last year, the demand for loans from Gas & Oil companies or fossil-fuel companies fell 6% year-on-year and that followed a decline of 1% in 2022.

From a climate perspective, this may sound like good news because the drop in bank lending to oil, gas and coal companies should mean less investment and less production over time.

The reality, however, is that oil and gas companies don’t need a lot of loans because they’re generating so much money these days from their underlying businesses, said Andrew John Stevenson, senior analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. And that trend is likely to continue through the end of the decade, he said.

Its Fair Share of Ups and Downs

The oil and gas industry has seen its fair share of ups and downs in recent years, marked by cycles of booms and busts. However, the current landscape seems to be favoring a more prosperous outlook, with companies reporting healthy balance sheets and increased cash flow.

This financial stability can largely be attributed to the upward trend in oil prices, which have been driven by a combination of factors such as strong global demand and coordinated production cuts by OPEC and its allies under the OPEC+ agreement.

A Much-Needed Boost

The resurgence in oil prices has provided a much-needed boost to companies within the industry, enabling them to capitalize on the improved market conditions. With a steady stream of revenue coming in, many firms are now in a stronger position to invest in exploration, production, and technological advancements.

This influx of capital not only benefits the companies themselves but also has a ripple effect on the broader economy, as it creates jobs, drives innovation, and contributes to overall economic growth. As the industry continues to navigate through this period of relative stability, it will be interesting to see how companies leverage their newfound financial strength to drive long-term growth and sustainability.

Click here to read the full article
Source: FORTUNE

—

If you have any questions or thoughts about the topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

Explore key clauses and terms in oil and gas leasing agreements. Understand roles, rights, and obligations for effective energy development.

Oil and gas leasing agreements: Key clauses and terms

DISCLAIMER: We are not financial advisors. The content on this website is for educational purposes only and merely cites our own personal opinions. In order to make the best financial decision that suits your own needs, you must conduct your own research and seek the advice of a licensed financial advisor if necessary. Know that all investments involve some form of risk and there is no guarantee that you will be successful in making, saving, or investing money; nor is there any guarantee that you won’t experience any loss when investing. Always remember to make smart decisions and do your own research!

Oil and gas leasing agreements serve as the foundation for the exploration and production of hydrocarbon resources on land or offshore. These contracts outline the rights and obligations of both parties involved, setting forth crucial clauses and terms that govern the relationship between the landowner and the energy company. In this comprehensive guide, we delve into the key clauses and terms commonly found in oil and gas leasing agreements, providing insights for landowners, energy companies, and stakeholders involved in the industry.

Before exploring the specific clauses and terms, it’s essential to understand the purpose and significance of oil and gas leasing agreements. These contracts establish the legal framework for the exploration, development, and production of oil and gas resources on a particular tract of land. Whether it’s a surface lease granting access to land for drilling operations or a mineral lease conveying subsurface rights, oil and gas leasing agreements play a pivotal role in facilitating energy development while safeguarding the interests of landowners and mineral rights holders.

Primary Clauses in Oil and Gas Leasing Agreements

Granting Clause: The granting clause is the core provision of an oil and gas lease, conferring upon the lessee (energy company) the exclusive right to explore, drill, and produce oil and gas on the leased premises. It delineates the scope of the rights conveyed and any limitations or restrictions imposed by the lessor (landowner).

Royalty Clause: The royalty clause specifies the percentage of gross production revenue payable to the lessor as compensation for the extraction of oil and gas from the leased property. Royalty rates typically range from 12.5% to 25%, although they can vary based on factors such as market conditions, negotiating leverage, and regional practices.

Bonus Clause: The bonus clause stipulates the upfront payment made by the lessee to the lessor upon execution of the lease agreement. This bonus payment serves as consideration for granting the lease rights and can vary widely depending on factors such as the property’s geological potential, competition among energy companies, and prevailing market conditions.

The Duration of the Lease

Term and Termination Clause: The term clause establishes the duration of the lease, delineating the initial primary term and any subsequent renewal or extension periods. Additionally, the termination clause outlines the circumstances under which the lease may be terminated, such as nonpayment of royalties, cessation of operations, or breach of contractual obligations by either party.

Surface Use and Access Clause: Given the potential impact of oil and gas operations on surface land, the surface use and access clause governs the lessee’s right to access the surface for drilling, construction, and other activities necessary for oil and gas production. It typically addresses matters such as surface damage mitigation, restoration obligations, and compensation for surface disturbances.

Shut-in Royalty Clause: The shut-in royalty clause provides the lessee with the option to maintain the lease in force during periods of temporary cessation of production due to operational constraints or market conditions. In exchange for paying a shut-in royalty fee, the lessee can defer actual production while retaining the lease rights until conditions improve.

Additional Terms and Considerations

In addition to the primary clauses outlined above, oil and gas leasing agreements may include various ancillary provisions and considerations tailored to the specific circumstances of the transaction. These may encompass:

  • Assignment and Subleasing Provisions: Governing the lessee’s ability to assign its lease rights to third parties or sublease portions of the leased premises.
  • Drilling and Development Obligations: Establishing timelines and requirements for drilling exploratory and development wells, as well as minimum expenditure commitments to maintain the lease in force.
  • Indemnity and Liability Protections: Allocating risks and responsibilities between the parties for environmental liabilities, personal injuries, property damage, and other potential claims arising from oil and gas activities.
  • Force Majeure and Regulatory Compliance: Addressing unforeseen circumstances beyond the parties’ control, such as natural disasters or regulatory changes, that may impact the performance of contractual obligations.
  • Governing Law and Dispute Resolution: Designating the applicable jurisdiction and governing law for interpreting and enforcing the lease agreement, as well as specifying mechanisms for resolving disputes through arbitration, mediation, or litigation.

Oil and gas leasing agreements are intricate legal instruments that require careful negotiation and drafting to protect the interests of all parties involved. By understanding the key clauses and terms commonly found in these agreements, landowners, energy companies, and stakeholders can navigate the leasing process effectively and maximize the value of their assets. Whether negotiating royalty rates, delineating surface use rights, or addressing regulatory compliance issues, a well-crafted lease agreement forms the cornerstone of successful oil and gas development ventures. With informed decision-making and attention to detail, parties can forge mutually beneficial arrangements that balance economic objectives with environmental stewardship and community interests in the exploration and production of vital energy resources.

 

 

If you have further questions related to the [insert target keyword] topic, feel free to reach out to us here.

Enverus reports this week that oil & gas upstream mergers and acquisitions reached a new 1st quarter high over the initial 3 months of 2024.

Oil and gas mergers hit record Q1 levels in 2024

Big energy analytics and advisory firm Enverus reports this week. That oil and gas upstream mergers and acquisitions reached a new first quarter high. Over the initial three months of 2024. In a release sent out Tuesday, report author Andrew Dittmar. Principal Analyst at Enverus Intelligence Research (EIR), says M&A activity for Q1 2024 totaled to more than $51 billion in deal value.

In an interview, Dittmar says the action started right after the holidays. “We woke up on January 4 to the news that Apache Corp. was doing a $4.5 billion deal to acquire Callon Energy,” he says. “We knew Callon had been on the block, so that wasn’t surprising. Although it was a little surprising. Apache was the acquiring company, just since they haven’t been all that active in the space.”

The record first quarter comes on the heels of the 21st century-high deal total of $192 billion for 2023. Although the Q1 total deal value of $51 billion maintains the pace set last year. Dittmar says he doesn’t expect it to continue for much longer. “The remaining inventory for potential deals remains in the Permian Basin.” He points out, adding, “and the Permian is increasingly controlled by ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, Diamondback Energy, Chevron, and Occidental.”

All of those companies have executed major Permian-heavy deals in recent years. And Dittmar says they are now content to own as big a position in the most active basin in the country as they can.

Click here to read the full article
Source: Forbes

—

If you have any questions or thoughts about the oil and gas upstream mergers topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.

EIA data shows that average daily production in 2024 is 13.12M bpd — 7.1% ahead of the production level a year ago & 1.4% higher than last year’s record pace.

US oil and gas production are ahead of last year’s record pace

US Oil and Gas

Last year marked a record for US oil and gas production with an average daily production of 12.93 million barrels per day (BPD). That record was 5% greater than the previous record of 12.31 million bpd set in 2019.

However, current data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) shows that average daily production thus far in 2024 is 13.12 million bpd — 7.1% ahead of the production level of a year ago and 1.4% higher than last year’s record pace.

U.S. natural gas production tells a similar tale. The EIA recently confirmed that 2023 marked a record for U.S. natural gas production at 125 billion cubic feet per day (CFD). That was 4% ahead of the previous record set in 2022.

Natural gas data isn’t reported as often as petroleum data, but January’s natural gas production level was 124.6 billion CFD. That followed a monthly production record in December 2023. It was slightly behind last year’s record level, but there are some seasonal effects in natural gas production. If we compare January 2024 to January 2023, this year’s production level was 1.1% higher than a year ago.

Click here to read the full article
Source: Forbes

—

If you have any questions or thoughts about the US oil and gas topic, feel free to contact us here or leave a comment below.