Tag Archive for: oilandgas

Iran has signaled the possibility of disrupting traffic through the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, a key maritime chokepoint linking the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden. The waterway is a vital route for global shipping, with a significant share of oil, liquefied natural gas, and commercial goods passing through daily. Any restriction or closure could force vessels to reroute around the southern tip of Africa, increasing transit times and shipping costs while tightening global supply chains.

The strait’s strategic importance makes it particularly sensitive to geopolitical tensions. Energy markets could feel immediate effects, as delays or disruptions in shipments may influence pricing and availability. For oil and gas markets, the route serves as a critical corridor connecting Middle Eastern producers to European and international buyers, underscoring its role in maintaining steady energy flows.

For investors and market participants, developments around the Bab al-Mandeb highlight how geopolitical risks can impact logistics, energy distribution, and trade economics. Monitoring such chokepoints remains essential, as even temporary disruptions can influence freight rates, commodity pricing, and broader market conditions tied to global supply and demand.

Source: Al Jazeera
Read the full original article here

Ranger Land & Minerals curates weekly insights from across the oil and gas industry to keep our readers informed. To receive news like this directly in your inbox, join our free newsletter. If you’d like to learn more about mineral rights and oil royalty opportunities, contact us to speak with a representative.
DISCLAIMER: The summary above is based on information from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. It is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security, commodity, or investment product. Markets, regulations, and circumstances can change, and the information may not reflect the most current developments. You should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor, CPA, or other professional before making decisions based on this content. The publisher and its affiliates disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided above.

The U.S. Interior Department said it will distribute about $460.9 million in offshore energy revenue to Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, along with eligible coastal counties and parishes. According to the announcement, the payment is the largest such distribution to date and reflects a higher annual revenue-sharing cap tied to fiscal 2025 revenues. Louisiana is set to receive the biggest total at about $203.7 million, followed by Texas at roughly $124.5 million, Mississippi at about $67.7 million, and Alabama at nearly $64.9 million.

The funding comes from offshore leasing activity in the Gulf and is intended to support coastal infrastructure, restoration efforts, and local economies connected to energy development. For mineral owners and investors, the announcement is another example of how offshore production can feed back into state and local revenue systems tied to oil and gas royalties and broader public policy frameworks. It also highlights how federal leasing and disbursement rules can shape outcomes across producing regions, a topic that overlaps with Ranger’s guide to federal and state regulatory conflicts in mineral rights.

Source: Washington Times

Read the full original article here

Ranger Land & Minerals curates weekly insights from across the oil and gas industry to keep our readers informed. To receive news like this directly in your inbox, join our free newsletter. If you’d like to learn more about mineral rights and oil royalty opportunities, contact us to speak with a representative.
DISCLAIMER: The summary above is based on information from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. It is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security, commodity, or investment product. Markets, regulations, and circumstances can change, and the information may not reflect the most current developments. You should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor, CPA, or other professional before making decisions based on this content. The publisher and its affiliates disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided above.

Two commercial vessels were struck by projectiles near the Strait of Hormuz, a major shipping corridor between Iran and Oman that carries roughly a fifth of the world’s oil and significant LNG volumes. The incidents added to broader disruption in Gulf waters, with shipping data showing many crude and LNG carriers waiting offshore rather than transiting the area.

As risks increased, multiple marine insurers moved to cancel war-risk coverage for vessels operating in Iranian and nearby Gulf waters starting March 5, a step that can raise insurance and freight costs for cargoes moving from the Middle East. Tanker rates on key routes have climbed sharply this year, and oil prices rose as markets reacted to tighter near-term logistics and higher transport costs. For mineral and royalty owners, pricing and differentials can influence revenues over time, alongside market factors that shape payments (see how natural gas prices influence royalty payments and understanding oil and gas royalties).

Source: BBC News
Read the full original article here

Ranger Land & Minerals curates weekly insights from across the oil and gas industry to keep our readers informed. To receive news like this directly in your inbox, join our free newsletter. If you’d like to learn more about mineral rights and oil royalty opportunities, contact us to speak with a representative.
DISCLAIMER: The summary above is based on information from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. It is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security, commodity, or investment product. Markets, regulations, and circumstances can change, and the information may not reflect the most current developments. You should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor, CPA, or other professional before making decisions based on this content. The publisher and its affiliates disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided above.

A February 2026 World Oil outlook reviews federal actions since President Trump returned to office on Jan. 20, 2025, saying multiple agencies have prioritized faster approvals and expanded access for upstream development. The article cites Bureau of Land Management approval of 5,742 permits to drill from Jan. 20, 2025 to early Jan. 2026 (up 55% versus the comparable prior period) and 22 federal lease sales in 2025 covering about 328,000 acres across 10 states and generating more than $356 million. It also notes Interior used emergency procedures aimed at shortening permit timelines to 28 days, alongside expanded Arctic-related activity and offshore leasing plans.

On LNG, the piece says the Department of Energy ended the January 2024 pause on new export permits and approved export authorizations for five projects, including Port Arthur LNG Phase II and Venture Global’s CP2 (listed at up to 3.96 Bcfd). It adds that DOE is streamlining grid connections tied to rising data-center power demand and expects U.S. natural gas exports in 2026 to be 4 Bcfd higher than in 2024 (a 33% increase). For mineral owners tracking activity drivers, context on oil and gas leasing regulations and what typically prompts operators to move forward can help frame how these policy signals may translate to local interest (see how drilling decisions take shape).

Source: World Oil
Read the full original article here

Ranger Land & Minerals curates weekly insights from across the oil and gas industry to keep our readers informed. To receive news like this directly in your inbox, join our free newsletter. If you’d like to learn more about mineral rights and oil royalty opportunities, contact us to speak with a representative.
DISCLAIMER: The summary above is based on information from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. It is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security, commodity, or investment product. Markets, regulations, and circumstances can change, and the information may not reflect the most current developments. You should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor, CPA, or other professional before making decisions based on this content. The publisher and its affiliates disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided above.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority when he imposed certain tariffs under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which invalidated many of those duties. However, tariffs affecting key oilfield inputs—including steel, aluminum, and copper—remain in place because they were issued under Section 232 of the 1962 Trade Expansion Act, according to the Midland Reporter-Telegram.

Claudio Galimberti, chief economist at Rystad Energy, said the decision limits the government’s ability to target individual countries but does not remove the broader tariff framework, citing a continuing global tariff structure that could rise from 10% to 15%. Economist Ray Perryman told the Reporter-Telegram that while tariffs may be harder to maintain, other legal tools could be used, and he expects that any gradual reduction in tariff pressure could lower steel and equipment costs and support broader consumer and business activity—factors that can matter for energy demand and project economics. The American Petroleum Institute’s Aaron Padilla emphasized the value of predictable trade policy for market reliability.

Related Ranger coverage: Trump threatens tariffs if EU doesn’t buy more US oil and gas and Texas leads the charge as America sets new oil and natural gas records.

Source: Midland Reporter-Telegram
Read the full original article here

Ranger Land & Minerals curates weekly insights from across the oil and gas industry to keep our readers informed. To receive news like this directly in your inbox, join our free newsletter. If you’d like to learn more about mineral rights and oil royalty opportunities, contact us to speak with a representative.
DISCLAIMER: The summary above is based on information from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. It is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security, commodity, or investment product. Markets, regulations, and circumstances can change, and the information may not reflect the most current developments. You should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor, CPA, or other professional before making decisions based on this content. The publisher and its affiliates disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided above.

Preliminary figures from the Texas Railroad Commission show the state produced 124,149,657 barrels of crude oil in November 2025 (about 4,138,321 barrels per day). Texas natural gas output for the month was reported at 1,002,396,104 Mcf (about 33,413,203 Mcf per day). The totals reflect volumes reported by operators from 157,813 oil wells and 83,966 gas wells, and they compare with updated November 2024 figures of 143,764,045 barrels of oil and 1,082,479,452 Mcf of natural gas.

The Midland area again led statewide oil production. Martin County topped the list at 20,755,579 barrels, followed by Midland County at 17,784,946 barrels, with additional high-producing counties including Upton, Loving, and Reeves. On the gas side, Webb County ranked first with 97,750,282 Mcf, followed by Reeves County (84,832,237 Mcf) and Midland County (77,756,512 Mcf). Reeves County also led Texas in condensate production at 6,338,309 barrels, with Loving County second at 4,288,680 barrels. For more context on Texas output trends and key drivers, see Texas leads the charge as America sets new oil and natural gas records and Permian gas wave sparks biggest pipeline buildout since the shale boom.

Source: Midland Reporter-Telegram
Read the full original article here

Ranger Land & Minerals curates weekly insights from across the oil and gas industry to keep our readers informed. To receive news like this directly in your inbox, join our free newsletter. If you’d like to learn more about mineral rights and oil royalty opportunities, contact us to speak with a representative.
DISCLAIMER: The summary above is based on information from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. It is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security, commodity, or investment product. Markets, regulations, and circumstances can change, and the information may not reflect the most current developments. You should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor, CPA, or other professional before making decisions based on this content. The publisher and its affiliates disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided above.

Winter Storm Fern tightened U.S. energy markets in late January, pushing Henry Hub natural gas prices up about 110% as cold-weather demand rose and upstream output eased. An analysis from the Texas Oil & Gas Association said Texas production declined roughly 7% to 10% while electricity demand increased about 40%. Over Jan. 22–26, ERCOT relied heavily on dispatchable generation—supplying up to 92% of output—with natural gas providing roughly 70% of total generation.

Rystad Energy estimated an initial natural gas decline of about 2 Bcf across several basins, followed by a sharper drop near 12 Bcf/d driven largely by the Permian and the broader Gulf Coast region. The firm also projected a January monthly-average oil impact of about 390,000 barrels per day from an onshore Lower 48 baseline of 11.378 million bpd, with output expected to recover as temperatures normalize. Rystad noted front-month Henry Hub moved from around $3.10 to $6.75 per MMBtu over the week beginning Jan. 19, reflecting both higher demand and reduced supply. TXOGA President Todd Staples said Texas gas production stayed near 28 Bcf/d and storage helped balance conditions, with withdrawals peaking near 12.8 Bcf/d. For mineral and royalty owners, price moves like these can influence payments (see how natural gas prices influence royalty payments) and may coincide with temporary operational pauses (see shut-in wells and royalties explained).

Source: Midland Reporter-Telegram
Read the full original article here

Ranger Land & Minerals curates weekly insights from across the oil and gas industry to keep our readers informed. To receive news like this directly in your inbox, join our free newsletter. If you’d like to learn more about mineral rights and oil royalty opportunities, contact us to speak with a representative.
DISCLAIMER: The summary above is based on information from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. It is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security, commodity, or investment product. Markets, regulations, and circumstances can change, and the information may not reflect the most current developments. You should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor, CPA, or other professional before making decisions based on this content. The publisher and its affiliates disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided above.

Devon Energy and Coterra Energy have agreed to combine in an all-stock transaction that values the deal at roughly $58 billion. Under the terms announced on February 2, 2026, Coterra shareholders would receive 0.70 shares of Devon stock for each Coterra share, leaving Devon shareholders with about 54% of the combined company and Coterra shareholders with about 46%.

The companies say the merger would create a larger U.S. shale operator with a major footprint in the Permian Basin, including sizable adjacent positions in the Delaware Basin, alongside assets in other core U.S. producing regions. Leadership is expected to include Devon CEO Clay Gaspar as chief executive, with Coterra CEO Tom Jorden serving as non-executive chair. The companies also highlighted targeted cost and operating synergies, alongside a plan focused on scale, inventory depth, and shareholder returns—an approach that continues the broader consolidation trend across U.S. upstream producers.

If you want more background on oil & gas consolidation, see our explainer on industry consolidation and our overview of oil production in Texas.

Source: MSN
Read the full original article here

Ranger Land & Minerals curates weekly insights from across the oil and gas industry to keep our readers informed. To receive news like this directly in your inbox, join our free newsletter. If you’d like to learn more about mineral rights and oil royalty opportunities, contact us to speak with a representative.
DISCLAIMER: The summary above is based on information from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. It is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security, commodity, or investment product. Markets, regulations, and circumstances can change, and the information may not reflect the most current developments. You should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor, CPA, or other professional before making decisions based on this content. The publisher and its affiliates disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided above.

Hydrocarbons are expected to provide roughly three-quarters of the projected rise in electricity demand from data centers as AI use expands and more facilities are built, according to comments from ADNOC CEO Sultan Al Jaber at Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week. He cited an estimate that power demand from data centers could increase by about 500% by 2040, and said oil and natural gas are likely to remain central to meeting that growth for decades.

Al Jaber also pointed to significantly higher infrastructure spending needs, saying the scale-up of AI and data center development is lifting global energy investment requirements to around $4 trillion per year, including funding for grids, data centers, and multiple energy sources. For additional context on how AI-related load is influencing the power market, see U.S Natural Gas Power Is Booming Thanks to AI and Texas approves $13.8B plan for Permian Basin grid.

Source: OilPrice.com
Read the full original article here

Ranger Land & Minerals curates weekly insights from across the oil and gas industry to keep our readers informed. To receive news like this directly in your inbox, join our free newsletter. If you’d like to learn more about mineral rights and oil royalty opportunities, contact us to speak with a representative.
DISCLAIMER: The summary above is based on information from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. It is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security, commodity, or investment product. Markets, regulations, and circumstances can change, and the information may not reflect the most current developments. You should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor, CPA, or other professional before making decisions based on this content. The publisher and its affiliates disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided above.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) says the Permian Basin may hold sizable additional oil and natural gas resources in the deeper Woodford and Barnett shale formations beneath West Texas and New Mexico. In a new assessment released Wednesday, the agency estimated about 1.6 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil and 28.3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas—volumes it said equate to roughly 10 weeks of U.S. oil use and about 10 months of U.S. gas consumption at current rates.

For producers, the assessment highlights why some Houston-based operators are increasingly looking beyond established drilling “landing zones” as they plan for longer-term supply. Researchers at the University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology noted the Woodford and Barnett targets are deeper and hotter than many conventional Permian plays, which can raise costs and increase associated gas volumes. The Barnett also contains more clay, creating additional drilling hazards, and companies still need to pinpoint the most productive “sweet spots” before development can scale. For a practical overview of exploration steps mineral owners may hear about, see How to Find Oil on Your Land and Ranger’s Oil & Gas Royalties guide.

Source: Houston Chronicle
Read the full original article here

Ranger Land & Minerals curates weekly insights from across the oil and gas industry to keep our readers informed. To receive news like this directly in your inbox, join our free newsletter. If you’d like to learn more about mineral rights and oil royalty opportunities, contact us to speak with a representative.
DISCLAIMER: The summary above is based on information from third-party sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. It is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, legal, or other professional advice, nor a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security, commodity, or investment product. Markets, regulations, and circumstances can change, and the information may not reflect the most current developments. You should conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor, CPA, or other professional before making decisions based on this content. The publisher and its affiliates disclaim any liability for losses or damages arising from reliance on the information provided above.